Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Madison County commissioners deny rezoning for proposed Dollar General after hours of public comment
Summary
The board voted 5–0 to deny a rezoning request for a 3‑acre site along Highway 29 that the developer said would host a 10,640‑square‑foot Dollar General. Dozens of residents opposed the plan, citing the county comprehensive plan, traffic and safety, well‑water concerns and potential harm to local businesses.
The Madison County Board of Commissioners denied a rezoning request for a 3‑acre parcel on Highway 29 near Wildcat Bridge Road after an extended public hearing and a 5–0 vote. The motion to deny was made by Commissioner Kirk and seconded by Commissioner Adams.
The applicant, Jason Fritz, said the proposed store would be a larger Dollar General format with about 10,640 square feet, roughly 43 parking spaces and a produce/cooler area. Fritz asked the board to defer the decision 30 days so the developer could meet with neighbors; the chair said the board would proceed with the vote that evening.
Community opponents, who spoke during a lengthy public‑comment period, urged denial on multiple grounds. Bush McDuffie, a member of the county comprehensive‑plan citizens committee, said the site lies in a “rural conservation” character area and “does not fit the character of our community.” Resident Carrie Wentz said she had visited nearby Dollar General stores and local markets and concluded the new store would “profit off us whether we want them or not,” and she warned the board about impacts on locally owned grocery options.
Speakers also flagged traffic and safety concerns at the site’s proposed entrance, which the applicant said would be sited to meet Georgia Department of Transportation standards and would include right‑turn taper lanes if required. Gerald Johnson and other nearby property owners raised well‑water and drainage concerns, saying several households in the area rely on private wells and that groundwater features exist on nearby parcels.
The applicant described the lease arrangement as developer‑owned with Dollar General leasing the store on a roughly 15‑year term with renewal options. He said access design and lighting are being planned to meet DOT and county requirements.
During deliberations commissioners focused on whether the parcel is an appropriate location for business development, separate from the specific tenant. Several commissioners said that even if a generic “business” use might be appropriate at some intersections, this particular location and the proposed tenant’s local track record made the rezoning a poor fit. Commissioner Kirk made the motion to deny; Commissioner Adams seconded. The board voted 5–0 to deny the rezoning.
The denial means the applicant may pursue alternative sites, pursue different zoning pathways, or appeal through the planning commission process, but no further action on this parcel was taken at the July 7 meeting.
