Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Committee hears competing views on bill to allow outside ABA providers in schools
Summary
The Michigan House Education and Workforce Committee heard extended testimony on House Bill 50 44, a proposal to allow outside clinical ABA providers to deliver medically prescribed services in public schools, with school leaders warning of conflicts with IDEA and advocates arguing such services are medically necessary and distinct from IEP entitlements.
The Michigan House Education and Workforce Committee heard more than an hour of testimony on House Bill 50 44, a proposal to permit outside applied behavior analysis (ABA) providers to deliver clinically prescribed services in public schools.
School special-education leaders told the committee the bill’s definition—"any medically necessary service"—is written so broadly that "the gate is wide open," raising the risk that medically billed services will duplicate, crowd out or conflict with services schools must provide under federal special-education law. They said funding, supervision and compliance with IEP procedures are unresolved.
The committee heard from Eric Hopstock, superintendent at Berrien Regional Education Service Agency, who said the bill’s language could force schools to reconcile two separate systems. "It is any medically necessary service. So the gate is wide open," Hopstock said, adding that privately billed clinical services are governed by medical rules and…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

