Residents at Flagstaff meeting voice split views on Flock cameras, privacy and safety
Loading...
Summary
Public commenters at the Nov. 4 meeting debated automatic license-plate reader cameras (Flock): some speakers urged city adoption to improve public safety and aid investigations, while others raised privacy, civil‑liberties and cybersecurity concerns and asked for strict safeguards and transparency.
Several residents used the open-call public comment period at the Nov. 4 Flagstaff City Council meeting to press opposing views about the city’s ongoing discussions with Flock, a provider of automatic license-plate reader systems.
Dennis Givens, a local Justice News cofounder, said residents worry about wrongful arrests from technology errors, privacy intrusions, hacking and the potential for federal or other agency access. Givens asked whether Flock is adopting face recognition features (“Flock Nova”) and urged stronger cybersecurity protections and legal limits on data use.
Nadine Hart, speaking from a safety perspective, said neighborhoods and families she’d consulted want Flock cameras at dangerous intersections and that “a human life should always trump these interesting conversations that I keep hearing coming to meetings.” Hart said she believed local residents in Sunnyside and Southside support camera deployment to improve crosswalk and intersection safety.
City staff and council discussed cybersecurity for other items later in the meeting (IT confirmed single sign-on and multifactor authentication options for a separate vendor contract), but no council action on Flock cameras was taken during this meeting.
