Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff flags intersection-spacing, city-council exception for Agnes Farm subdivision
Summary
So first thing on the agenda tonight is the Agnes Farm subdivision, the staff member said at the start of the item.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
So first thing on the agenda tonight is the Agnes Farm subdivision, the staff member said at the start of the item. The planning staff and commissioners focused on where a proposed internal street would align with existing roads near the city pump station and whether that alignment would comply with the city's intersection-spacing rules.
The discussion centered on the proposed stub tying into 5900 and the pump-station parcel near Lot 15. Staff said the parcel that contains a house will be torn down to accommodate the connection. Staff measured center-to-center distances and reported approximately 662 feet between the two intersections; a later measurement using Google Earth was reported as about 656 feet. The city's streets-and-roads ordinance language read aloud during the meeting states that intersections of major roads shall be at least 800 feet apart.
Staff and commissioners said that because the proposed stub would not meet the 800-foot figure in the ordinance, the planning commission could either (1) deny the preliminary approval, (2) approve contingent on the city council granting an exception, or (3) forward a recommendation and request an exception from the city council. One staff member noted that city council had canceled its next meeting, which could compress the timeline for any exception and affect the project's ability to meet final-approval deadlines.
The staff presentation also described a proposal to avoid a direct sale of pump-station land to the developer: instead of selling the small parcel and accepting it back as road right-of-way, staff proposed being a signatory on the final plat so the property would serve as road frontage without a sale and that developer-funded improvements to the pump station and access gate could offset any city cost.
No formal vote was recorded during the planning commission discussion; staff said the item was in first review and that staff would return with formal recommendations. The commission requested that staff (identified in the meeting as Greg and Matt) verify whether the intersection alignment as drawn triggers a required city-council exception and to confirm setbacks, pump-station clearance and whether Lot 15's lot-size combination affects the plat.
Clarifying details identified during the discussion included: staff-reported center-to-center spacing at about 662 feet (Staff member, 00:05:27); a Google Earth check of about 656 feet (Amanda, 00:11:05); and confirmation that Lot 15's existing house would be removed (Amanda, 00:06:26). Staff said the developer will likely need to show that setbacks from the pump house meet code and that staff would double-check the dimensions.
Next steps: staff will review the plat alignment and advise whether the planning commission may approve with conditions or should forward an exception request to the city council. The item remained at preliminary review and no final action was taken.

