Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Development Fees topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

San Luis adopts updated development-impact fees; council records two abstentions

Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Luis, Arizona · July 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council adopted Resolution 23-66, updating development impact fees that were last revised in December 2019. Staff said all required notices and hearings were completed; the measure passed with recorded abstentions and will take effect Sept. 22 if unchanged.

The San Luis City Council adopted Resolution 23-66 on July 9, updating the city's development impact fees. Staff said the final step for adoption had followed required notice and public hearings and that the fees, if adopted as presented, would become effective Sept. 22.

Jose Guzman, the cityb4s director of development services, explained the methodology: staff inventories existing parkland and amenities, projects demand over a 10-year horizon based on building-permit trends, and calculates land and amenity needs to set fee levels. Guzman said the update includes planned acreage for East Community Park and Giordano Community Park and associated amenities; impact fees pay for additional land and capital improvements but cannot be used for maintenance.

Council discussion included questions about the parks line items, the cost-per-acre assumptions, and whether any public comments were received in the adoption process; staff said no public comments had been submitted on the fee updates. Council also discussed conflicts of interest and the statutory "rule of ten" that can allow otherwise-interested council members to participate if there are at least ten similarly situated businesspersons in the jurisdiction.

A motion to adopt Resolution 23-66 passed with a recorded vote described in the meeting record as five ayes and two abstentions; the transcript records one abstention by Mayor Riedell and lists a second abstention with unclear spelling in the audio record. The resolution declares the update a public record and establishes an effective date of Sept. 22.