Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission approves findings for 440 E. Ogden and 620 N. Oak
Summary
The Hinsdale Planning Commission on July 9 approved findings and recommendations for exterior appearance and site-plan review at 440 East Ogden Avenue and a map amendment, exterior appearance, site-plan review and final plat for 620 North Oak Street to allow seven lots, with one commissioner recorded as abstaining on the motion.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Hinsdale Planning Commission approved findings and recommendations on July 9 for two pending land-use matters: exterior appearance and site-plan review for the existing building at 440 East Ogden Avenue and a map amendment, exterior appearance and site-plan review, and final plat for 620 North Oak Street to permit the development of seven lots in the R 4 Saint Plymouth District.
Commissioners had no requested revisions to the written findings and recommendation documents prepared by staff and voted to adopt them as submitted. The motion to approve both documents was moved and seconded; the roll call vote recorded one abstention by Commissioner Jablonski and otherwise affirmative votes from commissioners present.
The staff report described case --30--2025 as a site-plan and elevation review within the B 3 General Business District at 440 East Ogden Avenue. The second item, listed as --16--2025, was described in the staff materials as a map amendment and final plat to allow a seven-lot subdivision at 620 North Oak Street in the R 4 Saint Plymouth District. The commission did not raise substantive questions on either item during the meeting.
Because the findings and recommendations were adopted, the record reflects staff’s determinations as presented; the documents in the packet contain the full factual findings and recommended conditions. The record did not specify additional implementation steps, permit conditions, or timelines for either case beyond the standard review process noted in the staff materials.

