Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Pilot topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board to refine PILOT/housing position after committee review; some trustees oppose current draft
Summary
Trustees debated whether to continue work on PILOT (payment-in-lieu-of-taxes) pilot materials and a proposed public-facing statement. Some trustees opposed the current draft language and asked for a neutral explanatory statement; the legislative-action committee will draft revised language for board consideration.
During old business on Dec. 11 the Kingston board discussed continuing a prior-year effort related to PILOT agreements and housing incentives (the meeting referenced a county-level 421 housing law and recent memos). Trustees reviewed a library document summarizing prior committee proposals and asked whether the board wants to continue the work.
Some trustees said they did not support moving forward with the pilot as drafted. Mister Ryder said he did not support the current approach. Mister Spicer also said he did not support continuing as written. Other trustees argued for continued work to protect the district’s fiscal interests and for public communication explaining the potential impacts of PILOTs on school funding.
Doctor Collins and other trustees suggested producing a neutral, public-facing explanatory statement about PILOTs and their effects on school districts to improve public understanding; several trustees recommended edits to the draft’s tone and called for committee-level revisions before posting. Trustees also discussed whether mitigation approaches (such as county IDA negotiation or formulas used in other projects) could be pursued to reduce school revenue impacts; some trustees said such negotiations are within county or IDA authority.
The board did not adopt a final position. The legislative-action committee will meet and is expected to draft revised, more neutral language for the board to consider. Trustees asked for financial-impact information to accompany any recommendation; audit and finance will seek cost estimates and present fiscal analyses to the board in January.
