Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Teaching & Learning committee reviews CKLA pilot, digital equity and resource-allocation review
Summary
The board's Teaching & Learning committee reported on a curriculum audit, a Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA) pilot across K–4, digital-equity concerns for at-home internet access, and selection of the district for a resource allocation review pilot alongside 14 other districts.
Get email alerts on the Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the Dec. 11 meeting the Teaching & Learning committee summarized ongoing curriculum work, including a district curriculum audit intended to align materials with culturally responsive instruction and the New York State learning standards.
Doctor Collins reported that 22 teachers (K–4) are piloting CKLA (Core Knowledge Language Arts) and that early anecdotal feedback from teachers suggests increased student engagement and stronger critical-thinking connections across texts. The committee noted the CKLA pilot requires continued, in-depth professional development rather than a single “turnkey” training model if the district expects consistent outcomes across buildings.
The committee also discussed technology in instruction and digital equity. Presenters described EdTech coaching and examples such as STAR Lab, virtual reality field trips and Minecraft for Education. Members noted that some households may lack adequate Internet at home and encouraged families to complete a digital-equity survey so the district can identify needs and plan interventions.
Collins described a resource-allocation review pilot in which the district will participate with 14 other districts; the review is intended to examine school funding, teaching quality and how resources are used to prepare students (for example, 8th-grade algebra admission). Committee members emphasized careful interpretation of small subgroup data and continuing attention to equity across course pathways.
Committee members noted a timing constraint: decisions about curriculum adoption may be time-sensitive because of testing windows and forthcoming January testing. The committee planned follow-up debriefs and cautioned against rushing adoption without sufficient training and evidence.

