Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Saint Charles County council tightens notice rules for tabled items, debates public-comment limits
Summary
In a work session preceding the regular meeting, the Saint Charles County Council agreed on a new notice deadline for items taken off the table and debated time limits and topic rules for public comment while asking staff and counsel to return with legal guidance on hearing-time limits.
The Saint Charles County Council spent its work session reviewing and revising council rules on how tabled agenda items are handled and how the public’s time at meetings is managed.
Council members agreed that if a council member intends to remove a tabled item for consideration, staff must be notified in advance so the agenda can show when action will occur. After discussion about logistics and the existing 8 a.m. Thursday bill-submittal rule, council members settled on a notification protocol requiring notice to staff by 9 a.m. the Thursday before the meeting so the agenda can indicate that a tabled item will be acted upon at the next meeting. Rory (the council parliamentarian) and county staff said the timing aligns with existing agenda production deadlines but that a narrow exception process could allow urgent items with chair approval.
Members also debated limits on public comment. Councilwoman York and others asked for a uniform ceiling so speakers and the public know what to expect; several members proposed 3 minutes for general public comment and 5 minutes for public hearings or conditional-use hearings. Rory urged caution and requested time to research case law and constitutional limits before the council adopts strict new time bars for public hearings. The council agreed to pursue a rule clarifying that public-comment speakers should state a single topic on their speaker card, with the chair retaining discretion to allow an additional topic in exceptional circumstances.
Separately, the work session discussed operational improvements for meeting management, including a low-cost electronic ‘‘queue’’ to help the chair recognize who is next or procedural limits (for example, requiring a member to allow every other member to speak once before taking a second turn). No formal electronic procurement was approved; staff was asked to return with options.
The changes were presented as procedural clarifications intended to increase transparency for residents who track agendas online and attend meetings. Staff agreed to prepare draft language for the council’s rules to reflect the 9 a.m. Thursday notification requirement, the deadline language for bill submittal, and a proposal on speaker-topic handling for a future meeting. No final amendment to the ordinances or charter was made during the session.
