Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Tulsa County OKs rezoning for Allen Acres subdivision (CZ568/PUD872)

Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners · October 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners voted 3-0 on Oct. 20, 2025, to approve rezoning case CZ568 with PUD872, allowing the Allen Acres subdivision to proceed with 21 residential estate lots.

The Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners voted 3-0 on Oct. 20, 2025, to approve rezoning case CZ568 with PUD872, clearing the way for the proposed Allen Acres subdivision. The approved change reclassifies the property from agricultural (AG) to RS-1 with a planned-unit development overlay to permit 21 residential estate lots ranging from one-half to one acre.

County staff told commissioners the proposal is consistent with the county—s comprehensive plan and the anticipated development pattern in the surrounding area. "Staff recommends approval of this application," Kendall said during the staff presentation describing the project and its consistency with the rural residential designation that incorporates portions of the City of Bixby—s land-use guidance.

The applicant (Tanner Consulting LLC) was present but no members of the public signed up to speak. The board opened the public hearing, recorded no public comments, closed the hearing and then approved the rezoning. The motion to approve passed unanimously with Commissioner Salee, Commissioner Dunkerley and Commissioner Sims each voting yes.

The county—s staff report said the proposed Allen Acres subdivision would contain 21 lots sized from one-half to one acre and that the site lies within Tulsa County—s rural residential designation. Staff described the rezoning as consistent with anticipated future development patterns; the record does not specify conditions, required infrastructure improvements, or a schedule for platting and permits.

The rezoning is recorded on the meeting agenda as CZ568 (with related PUD872). Implementation steps (such as final plat approval or required public improvements) were not specified during the meeting.

Commissioners moved into an executive session later in the meeting on a separate District Attorney request.