Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Savings Bonds topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Monroe Council approves $11.5M refunding bond and companion financing for township energy-savings project
Summary
The Monroe Township Council adopted two bond ordinances on Nov. 20 to fund a township energy‑savings and solar program, approving an $11.5 million refunding bond (O092025-022) and a companion $4.6 million bond (O092025-023).
Get email alerts on the Energy Savings Bonds topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Monroe Township Council adopted an energy savings obligation refunding bond ordinance (O092025-022) and a companion bond ordinance (O092025-023) to fund a township energy‑savings improvement program, council members said at the Nov. 20 meeting.
The laws appropriated $11,500,000 (O092025-022) and $4,600,000 (O092025-023) to finance equipment, solar installations, lighting, building-envelope improvements and related soft costs. Council President Miriam Cohen said the two ordinances together will fund the design‑build project and the town has received outside technical and finance reviews as part of the local‑finance process.
Why it matters: Town staff and the vendor said the project produces long‑term utility savings and allows Monroe to capture a time‑limited federal incentive the township would otherwise forfeit. At public comment, residents asked for more concrete debt‑service numbers, questioned life expectancy of equipment relative to bond terms and raised concerns about siting (including floating solar on township ponds).
What officials said: A township finance representative told residents that the municipal bond interest rate will be set at sale but cited a recent municipal sale below 3.2% and said the council used a conservative projection of 3.85% for planning. The official estimated the combined annual debt service could vary year‑to‑year — roughly $900,000 in earlier years and nearer $600,000 in later years under the projection — and said the annual cost would be covered by the project’s energy savings plus credits from remote net metering at certain facilities.
A town official and the Schneider Electric representative said the project’s estimated gross savings are about $20,000,000 over 20 years. That figure, they said, includes reduced electric and gas costs and a federal incentive of roughly $3.5 million that project supporters said is expiring at year‑end and is a primary reason to move quickly.
Resident concerns and vendor responses: Resident Michelle Arminio pressed for a clear annual debt‑service figure and the total cost of borrowing; staff said they would provide more detailed amortization estimates after the estoppel period and once the bond sale is set. The town also said the project contract includes a provision allowing the township to withdraw if critical federal incentives or guaranteed savings fail to materialize.
On siting and technology, Scott Purdy of Schneider Electric said the program includes rooftop and carport solar installations and that floating solar platforms would rest on top of water rather than being submerged; he identified a nearby New Jersey installation as an example and offered a site visit for council members.
Vote: Councilman Charles DePiro, Councilman Michael Markell, Councilwoman Rupa Siegel and Council President Miriam Cohen voted yes on each ordinance; Council Vice President Terence Van Zora was absent. Both ordinances passed by roll‑call vote.
What’s next: Town staff said they will circulate detailed financing projections and presentations previously given to the council. The contracts and implementation timeline will be discussed as the town proceeds to sale and construction.

