Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment And Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents raise housing, Maglev and travel service concerns during public comment at Pittsburgh council meeting
Summary
At the Oct. 21 Pittsburgh City Council meeting, residents raised housing policy preferences based on a neighborhood survey, warned that a Maglev rail proposal remains on regional plans, and reported service problems at an intercity bus station. Speakers presented personal testimony and survey figures during the public‑comment period.
Residents used the council’s public‑comment period on Oct. 21 to press issues including housing policy, an alleged continued Maglev proposal, and service problems at a Greyhound bus station.
"We asked readers: should Pittsburgh mandate affordable housing in new developments of 20 or more units, or use a voluntary approach with tax incentives?" said Chris Morey, identifying himself as a Squirrel Hill resident and reporting results of a neighborhood survey. "We had 98 survey responses. 43% of them were in favor of voluntary compliance with incentives," Morey said, and he reported that 21% favored a mandatory inclusionary zoning requirement and 23% supported no inclusionary zoning. He also summarized survey responses on fleet purchases and the use of a budget surplus for playgrounds, vehicle funds or holding for a shortfall.
David Tessitore of Banksville (District 2) warned council that "Maglev is supposed to come into the city from Greensburg on 30 foot stilts and go out to the airport through a new turnpike to be built through my district." Tessitore said the Maglev plan remained "on the books" and expressed concern that outside private and regional interests could seek federal funds that would affect neighborhoods in his district.
A speaker identified as Kitza described being stranded at the Greyhound station in Youngstown, Ohio. Kitza told council she was not contacted promptly after filing a complaint and said the situation left elderly and other travelers vulnerable; she urged council and consumer‑protection authorities to follow up.
Other speakers gave personal testimony on a range of topics, including claims about missing persons and trafficking; those speakers were recorded under public comment without formal council response.
Why this matters: comments on inclusionary zoning and budget priorities reflect local sentiment and can inform council staff and committee work. Council did not make policy decisions during the public‑comment period; issues raised were recorded and, where related bills or hearings exist, may be taken up in committee.
Speakers and affiliations (as listed in the meeting transcript): Chris Morey, Squirrel Hill (presented survey results; media/organizing affiliation stated on the record); David Tessitore, Banksville Neighborhood (District 2); Kitza (registered speaker; traveler complaint at intercity bus station); Jacob Poole (presenter of personal testimony alleging trafficking). All remarks reported here are from the public‑comment record and were not framed as council findings or verified facts.
Council did not take formal action in response to the speakers during the Oct. 21 meeting but later agenda items and staff follow‑up (standing committee meetings, public hearings) may address related policy areas.
