Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves SHRA's $341 million proposed budget and presses for county-specific breakdown
Summary
The County Board of Supervisors approved the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency's proposed $341 million budget for fiscal 2026 on Nov. 4 after agency leaders warned that federal proration and volatile appropriations could constrain housing assistance funding and that the agency faces technology and capital needs.
The Sacramento County Board of Supervisors voted to adopt the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency's proposed 2026 budget on Nov. 4, approving a spending plan SHRA officials said totals roughly $341 million and reflects a mix of federal, state and local resources.
SHRA Assistant Director of Finance Kaye Giunta told the board the bulk of the agency's revenue is federal and that about $216 million is dedicated to housing assistance payments (HAP) for the Housing Choice Voucher program, while roughly $60.7 million was allocated to capital projects and $37.1 million to salaries and benefits. The budget documents and presentation emphasized that more than 70% of the agency's incoming resources are federal, with the remainder from state and local programs.
'We anticipate approximately $341 million in new resources for the coming year,' Giunta said, summarizing the agency's sources and the program-level allocations.
Acting Executive Director Jim Shields outlined the major state and federal assumptions behind the numbers, noting a favorable state budget package that expands housing programs but cautioned about federal risk: HUD proration and the uncertain congressional appropriations environment have already trimmed reimbursements in recent years and could tighten funding further.
'The proration rate varies year to year and impacts how much HUD reimburses for housing assistance,' Shields said, adding that the agency received HAP payments for the current month and will continue to issue landlord payments while monitoring a federal funding stalemate.
Shields also described several implementation risks and operational projects influencing the budget, including a migration of SHRA's operations system from Yardi to Voyager 8, and a multi-year '10-year road map' for public‑housing sustainability that estimates a large long‑term capital need. He highlighted that emergency vouchers and coding issues at HUD continue to complicate forecast certainty.
Why it matters: The SHRA budget drives federal rental assistance distributed locally and funds capital projects and programs that directly affect tenants, public housing properties and homelessness response. Supervisors repeatedly pressed SHRA for a clearer, county‑specific breakdown of the budget, particularly how the $341 million maps to projects and services within unincorporated Sacramento County versus projects inside the City of Sacramento.
Supervisor comments and requests: Chair Phil Serna and Supervisors cited repeated requests for a clearer county/city split of project investments and asked for a forthcoming, more detailed staff briefing. Several supervisors also pushed SHRA to provide the capital‑vs‑voucher detail and project listings that make the budget's local effects transparent.
The board vote: After the presentations and questions, a motion to approve the SHRA proposed budget passed with unanimous support. Supervisors asked SHRA to return with supplemental, jurisdiction‑specific detail and a schedule showing which capital projects and programs explicitly affect unincorporated county residents and which are city projects.
Speakers and sources: Kaye Giunta, assistant director of finance, Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency; Jim Shields, SHRA acting executive director; members of the Board of Supervisors. Budget figures and program allocations were drawn from the SHRA presentation to the board.
