Citizen Portal
Sign In

District awards school-nutrition supply and food-product contracts; board pushes for less disposable packaging

Savannah-Chatham County Board of Education · November 6, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved multiple procurement awards for school-nutrition paper supplies (split among vendors) and a food-product/distribution award to a single bidder; board members urged staff to reduce styrofoam/plastic disposables and to explore compostable/paper alternatives.

The Board of Education approved two major school-nutrition procurement items on Nov. 5.

Bid 26-05 (paper products and supplies) received numerous responsive bids and staff recommended a split award across a list of vendors to supply cups, trays, disposable utensils and other paper/plastic items. The total estimated award for paper products and supplies was $1,843,810.95.

Bid 26-06 (food products and distribution) drew a single responsive bid, the incumbent Williams Institutional Foods. Staff noted the bid process was widely advertised but that the requirement to deliver to many individual school sites likely limited market response; the initial six-month estimated award was $5,167,565.78 with an annualized estimate of about $10.3 million.

Several board members raised environmental and operational concerns. Miss Grabowski urged reducing dependence on disposables, particularly styrofoam, and exploring compostable paper alternatives, but staff noted such alternatives are costlier and that returning to reusable dinnerware would require capital investments (e.g., dishwashers) and possibly additional staffing. Food-service staff said many principals and schools already use lockable device storage and some schools have locker-style storage for phones; in nutrition context, procurement and operations staff said theft in classrooms has not been a major issue where storage devices are used.

Board members asked procurement to examine whether food distribution costs reflected the delivery-to-many-sites model and to seek more competitive bids in future cycles. Both awards were approved by board vote.