Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ordinance Updates topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planners continue review of RV, renewable‑energy ordinances; flag accessibility and permitting gaps

Bluff Planning and Zoning Commission · November 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners reviewed RV and renewable‑energy ordinance drafts, focused on accessibility of tables for screen readers and on clarifying the permitting workflow that triggers conditional‑use review.

The Bluff Planning and Zoning Commission spent significant time on Nov. 6 reviewing multiple ordinance drafts, including the RV ordinance and a renewable‑energy ordinance that would govern solar and related installations.

RV ordinance: Commissioners reviewed public comments and redline edits and identified definitional ambiguities (for example, whether volunteer or nonprofit‑hosted RV parking such as the Bears Ears partnership constitutes an RV park). Commissioners also discussed accessibility: complex tables in Table A are hard for screen readers and should be reworked or fully written out with accompanying descriptions so assistive technology users can navigate them.

Renewable‑energy ordinance and solar permitting: Commissioners and staff discussed modern topics such as agrivoltaics and the state’s allowance for portable ("balcony") solar devices. They debated the permitting workflow: staff suggested the building department should continue to screen permit applications, determine whether a site plan or conditional‑use review is required, and, if so, forward the application to planning and zoning before construction permits issue. Commissioners asked staff to create an application checklist so applicants and contractors know whether a project requires Planning & Zoning review and to work with the building department on site‑plan definitions (level 1/level 2) to reduce confusion.

No ordinance votes were taken; commissioners plan to continue drafting, address ADA table accessibility, and request the building department’s input on site‑plan thresholds prior to a December work session.