Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Media Regulation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council bans future reality programming featuring first responders, allows one‑year closeout of existing footage

New Orleans City Council · November 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council passed an ordinance prohibiting new agreements that authorize reality-based television programming featuring city first responders, while adopting an amendment that permits the city to authorize a one‑year wind‑down for existing contracts to allow agencies to review and remove sensitive material from pre-existing footage.

The New Orleans City Council on Nov. 6 adopted an ordinance banning future agreements that would authorize reality-based television programming featuring city first responders and placed a one-year, limited exception to allow the closeout of already‑captured footage under strict conditions.

Council members had before them an ordinance (filed as part of calendar items) and a separate cooperative endeavor amendment to allow the mayor to execute an amendment to an existing agreement with a production company holding preexisting footage. The council adopted an amendment setting the effective date of the prohibition to Jan. 1, 2026, so that the city may authorize limited, short-term use of existing footage only to permit police and other agencies to review and redact images or materials that could compromise victims, pending court cases or constitutional rights.

The proposed ban and the CEA wind‑down were driven by public concerns that production crews had been allowed near or inside active crime scenes. An online public comment from Jonathan Carter described a case in which a film crew reportedly entered a homicide scene without family consent; the commenter implored the council to ban “ghoulish” productions and cited harms to family privacy and dignity. Council debate included recusal disclosures from members with relationships to media producers and a recorded amendment vote showing five ayes, one nay and one recusal on the amendment.

Council language prohibits new agreements authorizing first‑responder reality programming while authorizing a narrowly tailored, time‑limited administrative process to allow existing contracts to be closed out and for footage captured before termination to be reviewed and redacted as needed. The ordinance also sets an effective date to allow the one‑year wind‑down and requires that future contracts with production companies of the banned type not be permitted.