Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Taunton council adopts several rule changes, sets 3‑minute public comment limit and reworks subcommittee structure
Summary
Taunton Municipal Council members moved forward with a package of rule changes and procedural tweaks on Oct. 7, voting to reorganize committee structures and to limit public comment time.
Get email alerts on the Council Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Taunton Municipal Council members moved forward with a package of rule changes and procedural tweaks on Oct. 7, voting to reorganize committee structures and to limit public comment time.
The council approved reductions in several subcommittee sizes and rewrote several committee descriptions, including a new Public Property and Information Technology subcommittee and a new Transportation subcommittee. “The committee shall also concern itself with telecommunications, new technologies, information technology,” the revised public property language reads, as presented to the council.
Why it matters: The changes alter how the council conducts internal oversight and how members are assigned to committee work, and they were billed by proponents as measures to increase transparency and efficiency.
Discussion and votes: Attorney Matthew J. Costa, representing the law department, read an advisory memorandum about committee files and the council’s ability to purge unacted items at the end of a two‑year term and cited Massachusetts precedents. After debate, the council voted to adopt several of the subcommittee changes. Councillor Duarte moved to remove a defunct “Industrial Development Department” reference from the housing and economic development description; the council accepted that edit.
Public input procedures drew the heaviest debate. The council voted to codify a three‑minute limit on public‑comment remarks. “If it’s our intention to say that public input is limited to 3 minutes, then it should be in our ordinance,” Councilor Sanders said during the debate. A separate motion to add a visible timer generated a close vote and later failed on a roll call; a proposal to enable automatic microphone shutoff at three minutes was referred for reconsideration at a later meeting.
Leadership and seniority: Councilors also debated how to select the council president and how to break ties in seniority. After discussion and roll‑call votes, the council approved changing existing tie‑breaking language so that, where seniority is equal, the most recent municipal election results (the latest election) would be used rather than drawing lots or reverting to the earliest election. A proposal to elect a council president for two‑year terms with term limits was discussed but not finally adopted; the council also referred the idea of adding a vice president to a future meeting.
What the council did not adopt: Members specifically declined to implement an immediate automatic microphone shutdown for members of the public. Instead, they referred microphone shutoff and related enforcement language to a future meeting to allow further study and input.
Next steps: Council leaders tabled remaining language in the working document and asked members to return with refined wording at the next scheduled meeting. Several items — including the microphone‑shutoff question and vice‑president proposal — were placed on a future agenda for further consideration.
Councilors and staff who spoke on the record: Council President Martin; Councilor Barry Sanders; Councilor Duarte; Councilor Coit; Councilor Pottier; Matthew J. Costa, Esq. (law department).
