Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Juvenile Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clovis commission adopts resolution encouraging use of juvenile protective‑custody tools, not new curfew law
Summary
The commission unanimously adopted Resolution 3344-2025, a symbolic measure encouraging police to use existing statutory tools such as protective custody or CYFD referrals when juveniles appear endangered. City Attorney and sponsor said the resolution does not create new criminal penalties or reinstate a curfew.
The Clovis City Commission unanimously adopted Resolution 3344-2025 expressing support for law enforcement’s use of existing statutory tools to protect juveniles who are in danger, while clarifying the measure does not establish a new curfew or criminalize juvenile presence in public.
Commissioner Debbie Zamora introduced the item and acknowledged legal constraints following a 1999 state Supreme Court decision preempting municipal juvenile curfew ordinances. City Attorney (Mister Morris) explained the resolution’s intent: it is “symbolic” and intended to remind police of tools available under state law, including taking juveniles into protective custody when statutory criteria are met and making referrals to the Children, Youth and Families Department (CYFD).
During debate Commissioner Paula and others asked for clarification about how the measure would be applied to routine activities such as school events or late‑night travel. The city attorney stated that protective custody requires an independent showing of danger or endangerment and cannot be invoked solely for being out late: “You cannot just say that a juvenile needs protective custody because they're out past 12,” the attorney said.
Commissioner Casaus moved to approve the resolution; Commissioner Garza seconded. The vote was recorded unanimous and the resolution was adopted. Police representatives present, including Captain Romero, were acknowledged while the commission emphasized the resolution’s non‑punitive nature.
The commission directed that the resolution be communicated to the police department as a reminder of existing statutory options and the city attorney said staff would be available to answer future legal or procedural questions.
