Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves site plan for temporary railroad processing facility at 2172 N. 30th St.
Summary
The council approved Resolution 25-22 to allow a temporary railroad‑type processing facility at 2172 N. 30th St. Staff said EGLE and, where applicable, Army Corps permitting will regulate dust and air quality; planning staff noted a unanimous planning commission recommendation.
The Escanaba City Council approved a site plan Nov. 25 for a temporary railroad‑type processing facility at 2172 N. 30th St. Administration told the council the site plan enables the applicant to complete permitting with the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) and that the special permitting regime required in the absence of a county materials-management program places this matter before council.
City staff said the planning commission unanimously recommended approval. Joey Walker, the city'planning administrator, told council the property sits within or adjacent to railroad right of way and in an industrially zoned area, and the commission found the proposed use consistent with nearby zoning.
City staff described potential impacts and controls: the applicant provided a dust‑control plan and a water/misting system for dust mitigation, and operating hours were stated as 7 a.m. to 4 p.m. Staff estimated that noise and vibration from grinding operations could be perceptible at up to about 500 meters without a physical barrier but compared the expected noise to truck traffic or typical construction activities; EGLE will regulate air quality and dust through its permit.
Council discussed whether the city retained any authority given the railroad right of way. Staff said the city may retain limited regulatory authority under Michigan Part 115/materials management provisions and would coordinate with EGLE and other agencies if issues arose. The council moved, supported and carried the resolution (Resolution 25‑22) to approve the site plan so the applicant could proceed with state permitting.
No operational permit conditions or noise/dust monitoring schedules were read into the record at the meeting; the transcript records staff representations that EGLE and existing permits would address many environmental controls.
