Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Tennessee justices probe whether final agency review offers an "adequate remedy" in James Wade Construction dispute
Summary
The Supreme Court of Tennessee heard argument in James Wade Construction Inc. v. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation on whether the Chancery Court had subject-matter jurisdiction to review an interlocutory administrative ruling and whether judicial review of a final agency decision would provide an "adequate remedy." Harrison Kilgore of the Tennessee Attorney General's Office told the court that "in a case where a petitioner can obtain the same relief that they are seeking on an interlocutory basis on final review and they have not articulated any form of irreparable harm ... that is an adequate remedy."
The Supreme Court of Tennessee heard argument in James Wade Construction Inc. v. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation on whether the Chancery Court had subject-matter jurisdiction to review an interlocutory administrative ruling and whether judicial review of a final agency decision would provide an "adequate remedy." Harrison Kilgore of the Tennessee Attorney General's Office told the court that "in a case where a petitioner can obtain the same relief that they are seeking on an interlocutory basis on final review and they have not articulated any form of irreparable harm ... that is an adequate remedy."
Kilgore urged the court to treat…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
