Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
BZA allows historic barn unit and related variances to preserve contributing property
Summary
After staff raised concerns about compliance with accessory‑dwelling and eco‑area standards, the board approved six variances to allow an upper‑floor apartment in a historic barn and related design elements to remain; approval was 4‑1.
The board approved six variances (VAR‑25‑65A‑F) requested by petitioner Chris Berg concerning a property that includes an older residence and a rehabilitated barn with a second‑floor apartment. Staff identified multiple triggers requiring relief: ADU square‑foot limits, contiguous buildable area minimums, Eco‑Area protections (Area 2) and a side‑yard setback encroachment. The petitioner said the upper floor had historically been used as an apartment and that the barn and house predate current zoning. After testimony and review of historical photos and a certified plot plan, the board approved the variances (4‑1).
Staff recommended denial of the ADU‑related variances because the site did not meet minimum lot size and contiguity provisions, but recommended approval of some ECO‑area variances that would allow an as‑built carport to remain. The board approved relief for the owner to retain the configuration, noting the property’s historic character, prior use and the owner’s remedial work to bring systems (including septic) into compliance. The board emphasized such approvals should be used sparingly and weighed against the comprehensive plan and environmental protections.
Outcome: Six variances granted 4‑1; owner to complete any outstanding permits and meet conditions keyed to septic and building‑permit compliance.
