Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fundraising Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee recommends fundraising policy to full board with carve-outs for student-run stores and CTE programs
Summary
The governance committee voted Nov. 6 to recommend a district fundraising policy to the full board. The draft relies on an MSBA template but specifically exempts official student-run school stores and certain CTE and district-sponsored academic programs from fundraising restrictions so they can operate under procurement requirements.
The governance committee on Nov. 6 voted to recommend a district-wide fundraising policy to the full board for consideration at the Nov. 10 business meeting.
General Counsel Laura McLaughlin told the committee the draft policy is based on the Missouri School Boards Association (MSBA) template (IGDF) with one local carve-out: official student-run school stores and district-supported academic programs (for example, culinary-pathway programs and some CTE activities that produce and sell goods) will not be treated as fundraising for the purposes of this policy and will instead follow district procurement requirements. McLaughlin said the change was intended to preserve CTE and school-store activities while still providing guardrails for other fundraising.
Committee members discussed distinctions among district-sponsored fundraisers, student-initiated club fundraisers and booster or outside-group fundraising. One member noted that outside fundraising can exacerbate inequality between schools and said the policy should make clear that outside entities cannot use the district logo. McLaughlin said outside groups may identify themselves as booster groups but may not use district logos and the district will retain control over funds raised through district-sponsored activities.
A committee member moved to recommend the policy to the full board; after a second, members voted in favor and the motion carried.
Actions
Motion: "I move that we accept the recommendation of the 6.1 fundraising policy and move it to the board." Mover: unnamed in transcript. Second: unnamed in transcript. Outcome: approved (committee vote recorded as "Aye" and motion approved).
Details that remain to be resolved include whether the district wants to adopt an equitable-sharing mechanism (for example, distributing a percentage of fundraising across schools) to address disparities among booster groups; staff said that option is under discussion but not specified in the draft.
Provenance: Fundraising-policy presentation, discussion and motion appear in the meeting transcript at 00:42:52 through the motion at 00:53:09.
