Audit of draft articles vs. transcript and meeting record

This audit reviews the draft coverage against the meeting transcript and the Issues Rules provided.

spelling: [ {"type":"spelling_inconsistency","description":"Transcript uses multiple spellings for trustee names (Benkoli/Bencoli/Bancolle); unified spelling to 'Trustee Benkoli' using the transcript most common form.","severity":"medium"}, {"type":"place_name_misspelling","description":"Proclamation transcript contains several garbled references ('Hinnober Park', 'Hanro Park'); corrected to 'Hanover Park' in articles and proper_names.","severity":"high"} ]

clarity: []

chronology: [ {"type":"sequence_confusion","description":"Initial draft implied the board had adopted a resolution on Nov. 6. The transcript shows the board scheduled a follow-up workshop instead; the article was revised to state the board did not adopt an ordinance or resolution on Nov. 6 but set Nov. 14 for draft review.","severity":"high"} ]

framing: [ {"type":"overstatement","description":"Early draft suggested formal legal protections were enacted; transcript shows only a scheduling action. Language revised to avoid implying adoption of enforceable policy.","severity":"high"} ]

misinformation: []

misidentification: [ {"type":"role_assignment","description":"Some public speakers share surnames that match trustees; care taken to attribute comments only where the transcript identifies the speaker (e.g., Jacqueline Gutierrez identified herself as a homeowner; trustee Gutierrez later spoke). Article preserves distinct speaker identities and roles as stated at first appearance.","severity":"high"} ]

out_of_context: []

Quantitative_precision: [ {"type":"approximate_amounts","description":"Mayor referenced Elite RF grant as 'a little over $48,000.' Article reports amount as 'about $48,000' and flags it as approximate rather than exact.","severity":"low"} ]

Process_clarity: [ {"type":"board_process","description":"Transcript shows trustees expected both an ordinance and a resolution. Draft omitted that background; article now notes the October 16 motion and the board's expectation to review both documents side-by-side.","severity":"medium"} ]

Context_clarity: []

Agency_clarity: [ {"type":"county_differentiation","description":"Discussion referenced both DuPage County and Cook County; initial coverage conflated guidance. Revised articles distinguish DuPage County counsel advice (reported to the board) and Cook County's separate executive action mentioned by a trustee later in the meeting.","severity":"medium"} ]

Question_emphasis: []

omission: [ {"type":"missing_votes","description":"Draft omitted the formal roll-call approvals for warrants and payroll advances later in the meeting; updated article includes the vote outcomes and amounts as recorded in the transcript.","severity":"high"} ]

bias: []

duplicate: []

Attribution lock check: All quotations and attributions in the articles are tied to speakers extracted from the transcript speaker list. Where a statement in the transcript could not be tied to a named speaker, the final articles describe the statement as "the board" or leave it unattributed as appropriate.