This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
The Marine Advisory Board on Nov. 8 recommended denial of a dock-waiver request for 1409 Southwest 17th Street after neighbors and board members raised navigation and emergency-access concerns.
Applicant representative Lisa McConnell described the parcel as a unified plat that includes a privately owned boat-slip basin and asked the board to allow replacement and modest extension of two finger piers (a proposed 50-foot and 30-foot configuration) and a raised seawall. McConnell said the applicant’s survey and tax assessment show the owner holds title to submerged land (a private basin) adjacent to the upland parcel and argued the proposed structures would not encroach on the navigable center channel.
Several nearby residents told the board the canal is narrower in practice than aerial images suggest and said a longer pier would block turning space and reduce emergency access for barges and service vessels. Roy Rodriguez said he lives across the canal and that a new 56-foot pier would “take up that whole area” and create congestion. River Oaks Association President Ted Morley said the neighborhood unanimously opposed setting a precedent that could further restrict navigation.
Board counsel reviewed the local code and the properties’ plats and advised the board the waterway width should be measured from the recorded platted property line, not from the outer edge of submerged lands, and warned that interpreting the code otherwise would produce unreasonable results for adjacent parcels. Counsel proposed a reduced pier length as a compromise. After roll-call, the board voted to deny the applicant’s requested waiver; the board’s denial will be forwarded to the city commission with the board’s recommendation.
Provenance: Applicant presentation and survey discussion (01:05:00–01:20:00); neighbor public comment (01:12:40–01:33:00); legal review and roll-call vote (01:33:45–02:02:05).
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,161 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit