Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves streamlined civil-service board appointment process and removes job-spec review duty
Summary
Human Resources asked the board to simplify how civil-service board members are selected and to remove a requirement that the civil-service board review and advise on job class specifications; the board approved HR’s recommendations after public comment.
Deputy Human Resources Director Crystal Milligan presented proposed amendments to the civil-service board process. Under current charter language the civil-service board consists of three members: one appointed by the mayor (with commission approval), one by the city manager and one elected by the classified service (a roughly 150-person employee pool). HR said the nomination and nominating-committee process is administratively cumbersome and can delay recruitment and hiring.
HR proposed eliminating an intermediate nominating-committee election step, simplifying how employee representatives are collected and reducing the administrative requirement that the civil-service board review all job-classification changes. HR said the latter duty — reviewing revisions to class specifications before they are implemented — slows workload (the civil-service board meets infrequently) and impedes timely hires and equivalency changes that HR controls for recruitment.
A public commenter, Marilyn Lamato, urged preserving the civil-service board’s review role to protect employee rights. Board members discussed the tradeoffs between administrative efficiency and employee protections and ultimately voted to approve HR’s streamlined process and the removal of the job-spec review duty. The board additionally authorized a change allowing two members of the nominating committee (or other designated representatives) to certify election results rather than requiring commissioners to serve on that certification panel.
Why it matters: The changes affect employee appeal and classification procedures and could speed recruitment; critics warned the amendments reduce employee oversight. The board’s approval shifts routine classification work to HR while retaining the civil-service board’s hearing powers for discipline appeals.
What happens next: Staff will revise charter language and process documentation; HR will implement a simplified nomination/election procedure and the revised certification process for civil-service elections.
