Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections And Records topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Clerk briefs committee on election preparations, nomination papers and records-tracking proposal

Sawyer County Administration Committee · November 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County Clerk Liz briefed the Administration Committee on election preparations, nomination deadlines, an internal records-request tracking proposal and a project to scan older resolutions into searchable files.

County Clerk Liz presented routine updates to the Administration Committee on election preparations, nomination papers and an internal proposal to standardize tracking of public-records requests.

Elections and equipment: The clerk said she visited a central election facility in St. Cloud with an election trainer and staff and reported that the new ICE voting machines towns agreed to use are an improvement over outgoing machines and will be used countywide. She noted that small towns may still choose to hand-count paper ballots at the close of voting if they prefer.

Nomination papers and deadlines: The clerk reminded potential candidates that nomination papers may be signed beginning Dec. 1 and that county nomination packets will be available; she said nomination papers for the primary must be turned in by the first Tuesday in January (the clerk stated that she interpreted the statutory acceptance requirement as up to 5 p.m. that day, and that her office will keep the courthouse door open to accept filings through 5 p.m.). The clerk recommended obtaining more than the minimum 20 signatures to allow for disqualified or incomplete signatures.

Records-tracking proposal and staff concerns: The clerk described a proposed countywide records-request tracking spreadsheet and training to capture large or costly requests. Committee members asked whether informal requests at a counter or via phone would have to be logged; the clerk said departments are encouraged to log requests but that requiring 100% logging of every informal interaction could be burdensome and counterproductive. Committee members and staff discussed striking a balance between capturing costly requests and not overburdening staff doing routine customer-service responses.

Other items: The clerk said staff are scanning older county resolutions into a searchable format for online access and preparing 2026 dog-tag distribution packets for towns that participate in that program.

Ending: The committee did not take formal action on a records-tracking policy at this meeting; staff will continue work on the proposal and can provide reports to the committee if requested.