Laredo CVB board seeks clarification after citywide budget freeze; Airbnb tax and collections discussed

Laredo Convention & Visitors Bureau advisory committee · November 6, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a meeting of the Laredo Convention & Visitors Bureau advisory committee (date not specified), members reviewed monthly financial statements and asked staff to seek a formal clarification from the city manager after a summer budget freeze delayed some projects.

At a meeting of the Laredo Convention & Visitors Bureau advisory committee (date not specified), members reviewed the CVB’s monthly financial statements and sought clarification about a summerbudget freeze that staff said applied “across the board.”

The CVB director told the board the office began the new fiscal year on Oct. 1 and that some projects previously planned were held and moved into the new budget after the freeze. “We did have a budget freeze this summer,” the director said, adding that the pause did not affect day-to-day operations but delayed a few projects until the new fiscal year.

Board members pressed staff on why a freeze that affects city budgets would apply to the CVB, which the director said is funded by hotel/motel (bed) tax rather than the city’s general fund. The director said the freeze was implemented citywide: “That’s across the board,” the director said, and projects that could be deferred were moved forward in the new budget.

Members also discussed efforts to collect lodging taxes from short-term rentals. Staff said the state currently collects sales and lodging taxes on many short-term rental platforms and that implementing a local collection mechanism requires an ordinance and interdepartmental work. The director said the tax department is coordinating with municipalities and that adopting local collection procedures can be a lengthy process.

Packet figures shown to the board included short-term rental metrics on the packet page cited by staff: Airbnbs accounted for roughly 36% of occupancy and an average-daily-rate figure listed as $154; another packet figure was cited as $922, but staff did not specify the exact metric or period in the meeting.

The board voted to ask staff to place an item on a future meeting agenda requesting that the CVB director and the city manager (referred to in the meeting as “Mr. Ned”) provide a formal clarification of whether the CVB is exempt from or subject to the citywide freeze. That request was phrased as direction to staff rather than a formal ordinance or budget amendment.

Procedural votes recorded in the meeting packet included a motion to excuse Lasita Valdez for business travel and approval of the September minutes; both motions were moved, seconded and carried by voice vote.

The board asked staff to return with clearer budget and collections information in a future packet, particularly a year-over-year comparison of visitor and revenue metrics to detect any emerging negative trends.