Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Des Moines council signals support to pursue parking tax, debates exemptions and rate approach
Summary
Des Moines City Council members signaled majority support to have staff pursue a parking tax on marina and related parking receipts while continuing discussion about whether to raise marina parking rates instead.
Get email alerts on the Parking Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Des Moines City Council members signaled majority support to have staff pursue a parking tax on marina and related parking receipts while continuing discussion about whether to raise marina parking rates instead. At a staff prompt, four of six council members raised their hands in favor of staff moving forward with a parking tax concept.
The proposal discussed by council and staff would be a percentage surcharge (staff used a 10 percent example) added to parking charges; staff illustrated the impact with a hypothetical $40 marina parking pass becoming $44 under a 10 percent tax. Council members suggested different preferred rates in the discussion: one member recommended about 15 percent to match peer examples, while others favored 10 percent or a modest increase to existing parking rates as a simpler, more flexible option.
The council debated exemptions. Some members advocated exempting public schools and colleges; others argued colleges already collect parking fees and should not be exempted. Staff noted common exemptions in other cities for carpools, vehicles with handicap placards, and government vehicles, but warned that certain exemptions could be difficult to implement in practice. One staff attorney said identifying and enforcing some exemptions ‘‘will be very, very challenging to actually implement.’’
Council members repeatedly emphasized public perception. Several said a plain-rate increase might be easier to explain to residents than adding a new tax line item on receipts, while others said a clearly earmarked tax can be more politically palatable because the public sees where the money is intended to go.
No ordinance or formal motion to adopt a parking tax was made at the meeting. Staff was directed to return with a draft ordinance and a range of scenarios showing estimated revenue, likely impacts of exemptions, and practical implementation details for council review.

