Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Old Franklin Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors press board to reject Old Franklin rezoning over erosion, traffic and rural‑character concerns
Summary
Dozens of residents spoke against a proposed rezoning on Old Franklin Road citing springs and streams feeding Overby Branch, stormwater and erosion from nearby developments, narrow roads and loss of rural character. The Board of Commissioners denied the rezoning 4–1 after debate and a failed motion to postpone pending new zoning code work.
Residents and property owners urged the Fairview Board of Commissioners on Nov. 6 to deny a proposed rezoning of roughly 10.07 acres south of Old Franklin Road, citing environmental and traffic impacts and the desirability of preserving the area’s rural character.
Owen Jones, who said his family has lived in the area for generations, told the board the parcel’s western boundary includes a ravine and springs that feed a stream on his property and ultimately Overby Branch. He said denser development "could very seriously impact" the springs and cause erosion that neighbors already have seen from nearby construction. Other speakers described the area as a mix of legacy large‑lot homes and newer developments and said Old Franklin Road and Overbey Road were not designed for higher traffic volumes.
Speakers requested the board preserve larger lot sizes along Old Franklin and Overbey, asked for sidewalks and crosswalks to improve school and event access, and asked the city to require green space and stronger enforcement of erosion and stormwater controls. A resident noted prior erosion from a development (Deer Valley) that deposited several feet of mud into a creek and required state intervention.
Planning staff and the developer’s representative said any future development would require hydraulic/hydrologic (H&H) and stormwater reports and that those reports would be reviewed by TDEC and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as appropriate. The applicant’s representative said buffers at least 60 feet from the stream would be provided where applicable and emphasized that design and grading details are resolved during engineering and permitting stages following any annexation or rezoning.
Commissioner Hall moved to postpone the item until the city’s new zoning ordinance is adopted. Counsel advised the board that it has discretion to defer or act; after debate about fairness to the applicant and municipal liability, the motion for a 90‑day postponement failed. The board then voted on the rezoning itself; the measure failed 4–1, with Vice Mayor McDonald the only vote in favor.
What the record shows • Primary concerns presented by residents: erosion and siltation into springs and Overby Branch; increased vehicle traffic on narrow roads; loss of rural character; and a lack of assurances about sidewalks and school access. • Staff notes: required H&H studies, potential TDEC and Army Corps review, and standard city stormwater and siltation controls will apply at the design stage. • Board action: After debate and a failed postponement motion, the rezoning was denied on a recorded vote.
— Based on public testimony and recorded debate at the Nov. 6, 2025, Fairview Board of Commissioners meeting.
