Board denies renewal for Aspire Capitol Heights Academy, citing academic and fiscal concerns
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
After a determination hearing, the board voted to deny renewal of Aspire Capitol Heights Academy’s charter. Staff had found the school had an approved improvement plan and some local academic gains but raised fiscal concerns including deficit spending; the board voted to deny renewal by roll call.
The Sacramento City Unified School District board voted to deny renewal of the Aspire Capitol Heights Academy charter after a determination hearing that focused on academic progress and fiscal sustainability.
District staff said Aspire Capital Heights is in the low renewal tier. Under state procedures for low‑tier charters, trustees may renew only if three conditions are met: the charter governing board has an approved improvement plan, the school provides clear and convincing local evidence of academic growth, and no other non‑renewal conditions exist (including fiscal concerns). Staff reported the school had an approved improvement plan and presented local data showing gains in reading and math at some grade levels, but staff and several trustees raised questions about CAASPP performance, early‑grade lower participation thresholds, and a negative and declining fund balance at the school.
Aspire representatives including Principal Tamara Williams highlighted leadership changes, a balance‑focused budget for 2026–27 and operational changes (attendance initiatives, tutoring programs, a foundational literacy pilot and community partnerships). Multiple parents, staff and community members testified in person in support of the school, describing recent improvements in attendance, behavior and student outcomes. The California Charter Schools Association also urged renewal.
After public testimony and discussion, trustees considered a motion to adopt staff findings and deny renewal because of low academic performance tied to multiple metrics and ongoing fiscal concerns identified in a district notice to correct. The vote was a roll call: the student board member abstained; the majority of trustees voted to deny renewal; one trustee voted no on denial. The board instructed staff to forward their action consistent with statutory timelines and noted Aspire may appeal the decision to the county office of education.
The denial ends the district’s authorization of the charter; Aspire or its governing entity may pursue an appeal to the Sacramento County Office of Education as provided in state law.