Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City outlines permit and process changes to speed housing projects; Housing Forward to analyze data
Summary
City staff briefed councilors on a package of development‑process improvements aimed at speeding housing delivery, including a preapproved plans catalog, a Housing Forward data‑sharing agreement and a Housing Acceleration Team pilot that targeted 30‑day permit issuance on a multi‑building project.
Get email alerts on the Development Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff briefed councilors on a suite of process improvements intended to reduce friction in the development pipeline and accelerate housing delivery.
Staff described work on a preapproved plans catalog (a repository of commonly used construction plans to shorten review times), a data‑sharing agreement with Housing Forward to analyze permit and infrastructure bottlenecks, and the Housing Acceleration Team, a cross‑departmental group that piloted a 30‑day target for permits on a 107‑unit Hilltop development. Staff said lessons from that pilot will be applied to other projects and used to produce a quarterly progress report to stakeholders.
Other initiatives include a reinstated fast‑track permit process for interior residential remodels (single‑day permit issuance for eligible projects), exploration of software and workflow efficiencies within the EnerGov/Tyler permitting system, and a review of sidewalk/driveway requirements and fee‑in‑lieu policies. Staff said they are also exploring ways to improve communications (for example ensuring property owners are listed as contacts on permit submissions so they receive review comments) and to pilot concierge support for high‑volume local developers.
Councilors raised policy questions about impact fees, how to ensure developers submit complete, construction‑ready plans (and whether the city should require a minimum completeness standard), and how to prevent stalled projects from lingering without progress. Staff agreed to provide a quarterly update to the development community and to provide additional analysis on impact‑fee options and cost implications.
