Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Freeman presents 637‑acre “Cool Spring Crossing” plan; traffic, housing and sewer capacity dominate council hearing

Sussex County Council · November 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

For the record, attorney Jim Fuquay, representing Freeman Companies, told the Sussex County Council on Nov. 4 that his clients are seeking four interrelated approvals for a 637‑acre mixed‑use community called Cool Spring Crossing: an amendment to the county—s future land use map from "low density" to "coastal area," a change of zone to MRRPC, and two conditional uses for an educational facility and an assisted‑living/medical office campus.

For the record, attorney Jim Fuquay, representing Freeman Companies, told the Sussex County Council on Nov. 4 that his clients are seeking four interrelated approvals for a 637‑acre mixed‑use community called Cool Spring Crossing: an amendment to the county—s future land use map from “low density” (rural) to “coastal area” (growth area), a change of zone to MRRPC (medium density residential, residential planned community) and two conditional uses for an educational facility and an assisted‑living/medical office campus.

The applications together would allow 1,922 residential units (534 single‑family and 1,388 multifamily), a town center with retail, cultural and recreational facilities, a 100‑bed assisted‑living campus and associated medical offices, and an educational component. Fuquay told the council that Village A would contain 700 multifamily units, with 175 units (25% of Village A) proposed to participate in the county—s rental program (SCARP) to provide lower‑cost rental housing.

Why it matters: The hearing centered on whether the property should be reclassified from the comprehensive plan—s low‑density rural designation to a growth designation that allows the MRRPC overlay and higher densities. Proponents argued the site is already surrounded by services and infrastructure — including the Bay Health emergency and urgent care facility, existing commercial corridors on Route 9, the Lewis–Georgetown bike trail and an Artesian water tower and mains — and that the project would add mixed housing types and capacity the county lacks.…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans