Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Library Materials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters clash over library books at Manheim Township meeting; district review policies cited
Summary
Several residents urged the board to remove books they described as sexually explicit from school libraries for middle-school readers. Other speakers, including a district parent and a volunteer librarian, defended librarians and described existing review and opt-out policies (noted in public comment as Policy 1052 and Policy 109).
Public comment at the Manheim Township School Board meeting focused on library materials, with speakers presenting sharply different views on whether certain books should remain in district libraries.
Resident Mark Deener and other commenters identified passages from novels they said are sexual in nature and said such material is unsuitable for middle-school readers. Deener asked the board to remove "graphic" sexual passages from school library shelves paid for by taxpayers and called for a reassessment of what is available to younger readers.
Several other speakers disagreed. Dr. Jessica McCardell praised district librarians and said libraries and schools should be places where curiosity is nurtured. She reminded parents that, as she stated, "they always have the ability to opt their child out of reading any book that they deem unsuitable for their child as per policy 1052," and that a formal review process exists under "policy 109" to request reconsideration of instructional material. McCardell asked the board and community to rely on established review procedures.
Parent and volunteer Lorraine Hintz described volunteering in school libraries and defended a diverse collection of books. She said libraries support teachable moments and critical thinking and urged higher pay and recognition for librarians. Board members reminded speakers that the board will follow its established policies and advised commenters about review procedures.
No board action on library materials was taken at the meeting; public comment was received for later consideration and potential follow-up under the district's review process.
