Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the HB 83 (DCFS) topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Local parents urge scrutiny of HB 83 after personal DCFS experiences; meeting hears calls to curb powers
Summary
Members described HB 83 as legislation that would expand DCFS authority to obtain warrants and enter homes; multiple speakers recounted personal or adjacent cases and urged the group to oppose aspects of the bill while supporting measures (like HB 33) that would require DCFS to report knowingly false reports to police.
Several attendees at the Davis County Conservatives meeting gave extended, personal testimony about interactions with the Division of Child and Family Services (DCFS) and discussed HB 83 — described by speakers as a bill that would broaden DCFS’s authority to obtain warrants, enter homes and assess children.
Dale Hawkins recounted his six‑year litigation against the juvenile court and DCFS, saying the system operates “guilty until proven innocent” for parents and that HB 83 would further expand caseworker powers to write and execute affidavits and warrants. "This bill... gives them more power than they already have," Hawkins said, urging members to contact representatives and vote against the measure.
Olivia (introduced herself as Tina Horlocker’s daughter and a person who was taken into court under DCFS investigation) described her family's experience, said the bill was introduced in response to a high‑profile child death and warned that it would make it easier for caseworkers to enter homes and physically examine children without additional safeguards. She also described HB 33 — a separate bill requiring DCFS to file a police report when it determines a report was knowingly false — as a partial corrective she supports but one that still needs stronger language.
Speakers emphasized deficiencies they see in juvenile court procedure: limits on discovery, allegations withheld from parents, and difficulty obtaining legal representation. The meeting produced no formal resolution; members were encouraged to follow committee schedules and contact legislators with arguments and suggested amendments.
No government representative from DCFS or the bill sponsors spoke at the meeting; the meeting record reflects personal testimony from affected residents and the group’s intention to organize monitoring and outreach.
