Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fountain Valley council weighs $100,000 traffic study, asks staff to seek faster alternatives

Fountain Valley City Council · October 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council discussed commissioning a traffic study for Euclid Avenue to address congestion and parking conflicts, raised safety concerns about parallel parking and RVs, and directed staff to explore using developer data, on-call consultants or alternative delivery to speed implementation and consider lighting improvements.

Fountain Valley — The City Council on Oct. 7 debated whether to commission a traffic study for Euclid Avenue after staff presented level-of-service data and examples of how parking and event-related traffic affect flow. Public Works Director Scott Smith sought direction to start the procurement process for a study that staff estimated could cost about $100,000 and span into the next fiscal year.

Councilmember Grandes said parallel parking and RV parking along Euclid create safety hazards, calling the parking arrangement “very dangerous” because it can reduce travel to two lanes and complicate left turns. “I say just paint it and be done, but, I guess we have to do it the right way,” Grandes said, questioning the cost.

Vice Mayor Kuneen and other councilmembers urged staff to explore whether developer-supplied traffic data could be reused. Smith said some developer studies could be used as reference material but cautioned that an outside traffic engineer might not accept older, uncertified data as primary input. He added staff would solicit proposals and verify whether on‑call consultants or a progressive design‑build delivery could streamline work.

Councilmembers asked staff to include pedestrian and street-lighting review in the project scope after residents and members noted poor lighting at park crossings. Smith said staff would bring back options, including a memo or an award report if a streamlined procurement path is identified.

The council did not take a funding vote at the meeting; it provided direction to staff to move forward with outreach for quotes and to return with a staff report laying out schedule, estimated costs and funding sources.