Eddy County designated accountable entity for regional behavioral health planning; state funding windows noted
Loading...
Summary
County staff and partners briefed commissioners on new state behavioral‑health funding under SB3 and HB2, recommended Eddy County serve as the region’s accountable entity (covering Eddy, Lea and Chaves counties), and asked the board to approve participation in planning and near‑term grant applications due by Dec. 19.
County staff and regional partners told the commission that recent state legislation creates new behavioral health funding and that Eddy County is positioned to serve as the accountable entity for the region that mirrors the judicial district (Eddy, Lea and Chaves counties).
"This item was previously discussed at the October 21 meeting... This concept or this initiative would have Eddy County setting aside, more than $15,500,000," county staff said during the briefing on funding opportunities created by Senate Bill 3 and related appropriations in House Bill 2. Staff and provider partners explained that SB3 established a behavioral health trust and that initial allocations and recurring distributions will be routed to regions; the region will submit a regional plan (due by June 30) and some rapid‑response grant opportunities are due sooner (applications for certain rapid funds are due Dec. 19).
Regional provider presenters outlined priority areas for the plan, including expanded crisis services, assisted outpatient treatment for justice‑involved individuals, certified community behavioral health centers (CCBHCs), residential treatment capacity for women and children, and services for youth and adolescents. Presenters said the state allocated an initial pool for start‑up and recurring distributions, and that there is a separate pot for quicker access to dollars (roughly $26 million statewide with up to $2 million per region) focused on critical gaps such as crisis services and residential treatment.
The commission approved the agenda item designating the county to participate in the regional planning and to submit required applications as the accountable entity. Staff noted the county would coordinate proposals from partner counties and providers and that individual program funding decisions would be subject to regional review and executive committee approval under the state process.
Commission discussion highlighted local crisis team successes and the potential to avoid arrests and hospitalizations through mobile crisis responses. Presenters also noted gaps in youth services and residential treatment capacity in the state.
