Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Athletics Soccer topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Maplewood AD urges three-school girls soccer co-op to protect student safety and competitiveness
Summary
Maplewood athletic director Sean Rhodes told the Penncrest board low roster counts and injuries make a three-school cooperative the safest way to sustain girls soccer; the board asked questions about PIAA classification, transportation and field maintenance and expects a formal vote in December.
Sean Rhodes, Maplewood’s athletic director, told the Penncrest School District board that persistent low rosters make the current three separate girls soccer programs unsustainable and unsafe. “To ask 8 or 9 kids to do what 11 should be doing, is not safe,” Rhodes said, describing seasons when teams finished with only seven to nine players because of injuries and illness. Rhodes proposed a cooperative program combining Maplewood, Cambridge Springs and Sagerstown, hosted at Maplewood, that would require a cooperative agreement with the PIAA and could affect postseason classification.
Board members pressed Rhodes and other athletic directors on logistics: when the PIAA classification numbers arrive, how hosting affects which school’s enrollment determines class, and whether the co-op would force teams to move up into a higher classification. Rhodes said classification rules take the host school’s enrollment and 50% of each partner school’s enrollment into account and acknowledged the district must be prepared to appeal classification decisions if needed.
Members raised transportation and facility concerns. One board member said maintenance crews are already stretched and questioned whether consolidating games to a single site would ease or intensify upkeep; Rhodes said Maplewood fields are currently mowed and that housing the co-op at Maplewood would avoid adding a new maintenance site. Rhodes and other ADs said practice transportation is not provided by the district and that travel impacts would be limited to game days, when buses and shuttles are typically scheduled.
The ADs asked the board for feedback rather than an immediate vote; the board was told a formal cooperative-agreement proposal would come back in December for a vote after staff examines classification numbers, appeals options and transportation logistics. No binding action was taken at the meeting.
