Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fort Worth council authorizes eminent domain to secure land for north-side water transmission main

Fort Worth City Council · November 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council adopted a resolution authorizing eminent domain to acquire roughly 1.1 acres and associated easements from DBE Realty Investments Limited for a north-side 348-inch water transmission main meant to boost water supply for Fort Worth’s growing northern sector.

The Fort Worth City Council voted Nov. 11 to adopt a resolution authorizing the use of eminent domain to acquire land and easements for a planned north-side water transmission main.

Councilmember Hill moved the resolution, saying the property — described as 1.132 acres plus permanent and temporary construction easements owned by DBE Realty Investments Limited at 8987 Boat Club Road — is needed for the North Side 348-inch water transmission main project to increase water supply to the fast-growing northern sector of Fort Worth. A second was recorded and the motion carried.

The mayor-and-council communication supporting the action included legal descriptions and survey exhibits attached to the staff report, and staff said the acquisition is for a defined public use tied to the water project. Council did not provide a recorded roll-call tally in the public audio; the clerk announced that the motion carried.

The resolution authorizes staff to proceed with acquisition steps, including use of the city’s eminent-domain authority where necessary. City staff said the parcel and easements will support installation of the transmission main and associated construction work; staff indicated project surveys and exhibits are on file with the city secretary’s office. The council meeting record did not include a timeline for construction or a final estimated cost for acquisition.

The council completed other consent items and adjourned after the vote.