Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Benton County staff will revise policy to allow sales tax to cover engineering costs for identified transportation projects

November 12, 2025 | Benton County, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Benton County staff will revise policy to allow sales tax to cover engineering costs for identified transportation projects
County Engineer Chris Byrd told the Benton County Board on Nov. 4 that engineering costs tied to transportation projects funded by the county’s local option sales tax total roughly $1,100,000 for 2025 and about $1.2 million across the following four years.

Byrd said about $575,000 of the 2025 engineering expense is attributable to construction projects explicitly identified as sales-tax funded. "And so in 2025, these are just the engineering costs that the highway department... incurred, maybe a million dollars, a little bit over a million, $1,100,000 of engineering costs," Byrd said during the presentation.

Byrd showed a five-year plan that highlights projects funded with sales tax and the engineering cost assigned to each. He told commissioners the draft resolution language he prepared would take effect immediately upon adoption but can be amended or rescinded by future board action.

Several commissioners questioned whether the policy should be treated as an ongoing standing change or revisited each year at budget time. The chair and other members recommended tying the review to the county’s five-year road plan and August budget schedule so the board can re-evaluate whether engineering costs should be paid from sales tax or the levy.

Byrd agreed to rework the policy language and bring a revised Section 5 back to the board, possibly as a consent item at the next meeting. He emphasized that some engineering work spans multiple years and that the board retains authority to change the funding source in future budget cycles.

What’s next: Staff will return a revised sales-tax/engineering policy to the board for consideration and possible placement on a future consent agenda.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI