Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Bradley County board selects Chuck Cagle as board attorney after committee recommendation

November 12, 2025 | Bradley County, School Districts, Tennessee


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Bradley County board selects Chuck Cagle as board attorney after committee recommendation
The Bradley County Board of Education voted to retain attorney Chuck Cagle as its board counsel following a committee recommendation and a pair of recorded roll-call votes.

A selection committee led by Amanda Lee reported that four firms applied and that the committee narrowed finalists to Chuck Cagle and Scott Bennett based on experience in education law, references and proposed support staffing. "We believe that either of these candidates would provide a competent and legal, professional representation to the board," Amanda Lee said when presenting the committee's findings.

During discussion, a board member raised concerns about Cagle's caseload, saying Cagle "represents 61 [or 62] different school districts," and asked whether he would have time to respond promptly. Amanda Lee said the committee considered backup attorneys and that Cagle's office includes several supporting attorneys who specialize in education law. Dr. Cash told the board that if a conflict arose Cagle would notify the board and recommend another attorney or arrangement.

The board first voted to choose between the two finalists, with the roll call returning six votes for Cagle and one vote for Bennett. The board then voted on a motion to retain Cagle as the board attorney; the motion carried by recorded vote (majority as announced by the chair). The board also approved a separate motion directing the executive committee (the board chair and the director of schools) to work with Cagle to draft an engagement letter for presentation at the December meeting.

Board members who voiced hesitation said their concern was practical capacity and potential overlap with Cleveland City Schools work; supporters emphasized Cagle's experience and the availability of backup attorneys. No formal ethics finding or litigation conflict was reported during the meeting; Dr. Cash said conflicts would be identified and managed if they occur.

The board will review the proposed engagement letter at its December meeting before a final retention is completed.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Tennessee articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI