Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Affordable topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors raise code concerns about high-density duplexes; commissioners discuss limited affordable-housing funds and process
Summary
Public comment raised noise and living-space concerns at recent high-density duplexes; staff advised filing a zoning/code-enforcement complaint. Commissioners discussed housing funds (LIHTC project downtown, possible $150,000 proposal), LITEC complexities and the need for a dispersal policy.
A resident told the Planning Commission that new duplex buildings near her home contain six-bedroom sides with a single small kitchen and no common living space, leaving occupants to congregate outside and disturb the neighborhood.
Judy Powers said the units lack adequate indoor communal space and asked the commission to consider how multi-occupancy units could be made to "work in a way that doesn't piss off their neighbors." Staff advised Powers to submit a zoning/code-enforcement request using the county's online form so code enforcement can inspect the property and determine whether there are building-code violations.
Separately, commissioners discussed affordable-housing finances and programs. A county-commission update noted prior action setting aside $100,000 for an LIHTC project (Mill Creek) and a commissioner-proposed use of $150,000 from assured-housing funds. One commissioner cited an account balance of about $360,000 and mentioned an $85,000 remainder from last year's allocation; participants said a policy is needed to govern dispersal of those funds and that a housing subcommittee (three commissioners) will continue evaluating options such as project support, individual assistance or a revolving loan fund.
Commissioners also flagged an upcoming text amendment (MFR45) and a concurrent general-plan update that would enable higher densities (about 18 units per acre). Commissioners said any change of that scale should be accompanied by a robust public process and additional hearings; several members signaled willingness to delay adoption and pursue broader public engagement.
No formal enforcement actions or appropriations were made at the meeting. Staff advised residents to file formal complaints to create a case record for code enforcement; commissioners will continue housing-fund discussions in subcommittee meetings and at future hearings.
