Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cannabis Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake County board directs staff to prepare one-year extension of cannabis tax reductions
Summary
After public comment and debate, the Lake County Board of Supervisors directed staff to return with a resolution extending 2026 cannabis tax reductions — keeping a 50% rate cut, a canopy-based base and suspending CPI increases — for one year while a revised ordinance is drafted.
Lake County supervisors on Tuesday directed staff to prepare a resolution to extend temporary reductions to the county's cannabis cultivation and business taxes for one year, preserving a 50% rate cut, using canopy as the tax base and suspending automatic CPI increases while officials review long-term options.
Treasurer and tax collector Patrick Sullivan told the board his office had received "many inquiries about this matter over the last few months" and warned the temporary reductions will lapse at the end of the year unless the board acts, returning the tax to its original cultivation-area basis and resuming annual CPI adjustments. "We would go back to cultivation area instead of canopy, and we would go, and impose a CPI increase each year," Sullivan said.
The board heard more than an hour of public comment from growers, processors and community groups. Autumn Carsey, a local processor, said cannabis is "one of the largest tax contributors in Lake County, second only to sales tax," and argued taxing canopy (potential production) rather than actual output is unfair and risks driving farmers and processors out of the county. Kyle Bill of Konoka'thai Native Wellness said cannabis funding supports youth and minority programs and warned that freezes at the state level will make local funding "more competitive" for rural counties.
Several speakers urged the board to respect voter intent. Rick Mayholt, a local NAACP leader, said the county "should abide by the decision of the voters" who approved Measure C. By contrast, a caller told the board the ballot language contains no explicit authorization to change the tax's calculation without sending the matter back to voters and warned of potential legal exposure.
County counsel (speaker in the record) and staff advised the board that the county code contains provisions allowing the board to approve reductions that do not increase the tax. "Under articles 6 and article 7 of chapter 18 of the Lake County code" the counsel said, the board may authorize modifications that result in a tax reduction, which supported supervisors who favored a one-year extension.
Board discussion reflected competing priorities: several supervisors emphasized the need to avoid measures that would "kill the golden goose" by making the legal market unaffordable and undermining enforcement progress against illicit cultivation. Others reiterated that the flat per-square-foot structure is inequitable and should ultimately be replaced by a percentage-based system tied to production or value.
The board did not take a formal roll-call vote; rather, supervisors gave direction to prepare and return with a resolution to extend the current modifications for one year and to bring a revised cannabis tax ordinance with additional enforcement language in the coming weeks. Treasurer Sullivan said he would place links to Measure C and relevant resolutions on the county website and bring the resolution back for formal consideration.
Next steps: staff will prepare the resolution extending the temporary modifications (50% reduction, canopy basis, CPI suspension) for board consideration; a separate, revised ordinance with enforcement provisions will be returned to the board in approximately two weeks. The board indicated it intends to re-evaluate tax policy sooner than the end of next year if conditions change.
