Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Socorro Planning and Zoning Commission approves replat for Aldama Estates at 11033 Sunnybrook Lane

Socorro City Planning and Zoning Commission · November 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On Nov. 4, 2025, the Socorro City Planning and Zoning Commission, with three commissioners present, approved Aldama Estates Replat D — a 0.92-acre replat at 11033 Sunnybrook Lane — following a staff presentation and recommendation to approve.

The Socorro City Planning and Zoning Commission voted to approve a replat for Aldama Estates Replat D at 11033 Sunnybrook Lane during its Nov. 4, 2025 meeting.

Planner Jure Rodriguez of the City of Socorro presented the application on behalf of property owner Josefina Contreras and noted that the parcel measures about 0.92 acres (40,214.89 square feet) and lies in an R-1 zoning district. Rodriguez said the proposal would reconfigure Lot 9, Block 2 of the Aldama State Subdivision and create one lot from a portion in front of the existing parcel; the submittal shows a long driveway providing access to a proposed Lot 2.

"Staff recommends approval of the replat for Aldama States Replat D Subdivision," Rodriguez told commissioners. Maria G. Robles of GRB Integrated Engineering Solutions, LLC was listed as the applicant representative and was available on the call, Rodriguez said.

Commissioner Andrew Arroyos moved to approve the replat and Commissioner Julie Dominguez seconded the motion. With Commissioners Arroyos, Dominguez and Yolanda Rodriguez present, the motion carried unanimously among those present; no nays or abstentions were recorded. Two commissioners, David Estrada and Oswaldo Reza, were absent from the meeting.

The approval followed no substantive questions from commissioners; staff and the applicant did not propose amendments to the replat during the meeting. The planning commission did not record any conditions or follow-up tasks on the record at the time of approval.

Other business at the brief meeting included routine acceptance of the consent agenda and reports. Planning staff reported no additional items. The commission voted to adjourn at 5:39 p.m.