Leominster schools rise to 50% of targets but 10th-grade math prompts review of Agile Mind

Leominster School Committee · October 8, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District officials told the committee Leominster moved from meeting 38% to 50% of its criterion-referenced targets, yet members raised alarm over a drop in 10th-grade math performance and asked staff to review the Agile Mind program and item-level MCAS standards.

Leominster Public Schools officials briefed the school committee on the district's 2025 accountability results and flagged a need for targeted work at the high-school level, particularly in 10th-grade mathematics.

Loreen Cipolla, presenting October 1 enrollment and accountability data, said the district—s criterion-referenced progress rose to 50% this year, up from 38% previously, and that the district—s overall classification is "not requiring assistance or intervention." The metric compares the district—s current performance against district-set targets.

At the same time, several committee members expressed concern about a drop in 10th-grade math meeting/exceeding percentages. One member noted a fall from about 38% to the low-20s for meeting or exceeding standards in grade 10 and asked whether the district—s adopted curriculum, Agile Mind, aligns with MCAS expectations.

"We do need to take a very close look at this," Cipolla said, noting Agile Mind is in its third year at the high school, teachers received professional development, and the district will review item-level MCAS results to identify standards that need supplementing.

A committee member asked for a formal review of Agile Mind at the next meeting; one speaker suggested that if the curriculum or cut-score shifts explain the decline, the district may need to adjust programmatic decisions. Staff agreed to bring comparative state data and the district—s target information to a future meeting and to return with specific breakdowns for grade 10 math.

The presentation included additional positive indicators: elementary and middle grades showed steady growth (particularly grades 4—7 in ELA), several elementary/middle schools improved their accountability percentiles, and the district met targets on chronic absenteeism reduction in lower grades.

Next steps the committee set were a data-driven review of 10th-grade math outcomes, a comparison to state percentiles and targets, and placing Agile Mind—s effectiveness on a future agenda for formal discussion.