Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Art Inventory topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public art inventory and review process advance; committee seeks volunteers and policy input
Summary
The committee reported progress on a public-art inventory and story map, agreed on a likely maintenance workflow with county staff, and discussed ad hoc work on public-art approval policy and possible fee structures; members volunteered to research specific murals and installations.
Committee members reviewed a public-art database effort intended to catalog installations countywide, including a story map with clickable pins and detailed pop-ups. The facilitator said the spreadsheet now contains artist names, bios, histories and funding notes for many works and that they will circulate the link for the committee to fill gaps. "We had the locations for them, and Zaf had worked with Ben Ogren to create the beautiful story map that we looked at last time," the facilitator said.
Members identified several pieces that need additional research and contact information: a butterfly mural attributed in discussion to Abby Edwards, landfill sculptures linked to Scott McGrath, a September 11 memorial by Judith Burton in the Art Park, and a John Wayne mural in Coulterville painted by the late Bob Joby (committee members said they will compile bios and documentation). The committee agreed to flag works that are on private property or on school grounds and to note accessibility limitations in the inventory.
Committee members discussed who should maintain edits to the county's GIS-based story map. The facilitator said the options are to give a county login to a staff or committee designee or to continue editing a shared spreadsheet and notify the GIS manager when updates are needed; members indicated the latter workflow is the most likely near-term approach. The ad hoc public-art review group reported two meetings to scope approval authority, review examples from other jurisdictions, and consider whether fees should cover staff time for reviews; they plan to bring draft language to the full committee for the October meeting.
Several volunteers took responsibility for follow-up research; the committee did not adopt final policy language or fee schedules at this meeting. Members also noted the database could become a standing agenda item once the bulk of initial data is compiled.
