Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Records topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council receives refresher on Washington Public Records Act and email best practices
Summary
City clerk and staff reviewed the Washington Public Records Act, advised council members to use city email and separate personal notes, and discussed legal nuances about when personal-device material or meeting‑invite correspondence becomes a public record.
Clerk Garcia led a short presentation for council on the basics of Washington's Public Records Act, telling members that a public record broadly includes "any writing containing information relating to the conduct of government or the performance of any governmental or proprietary function prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency." She stressed that most materials touched in the course of city business are presumptively public records and recommended using city email/accounts for official business.
Garcia and staff reviewed practical steps: separate work and personal communications, avoid deleting potentially responsive material, forward constituent emails related to city business to the clerk, and ask staff when unsure about retention. "Keep work and personal communication separate," Garcia said, adding that handwritten notes intended solely for private memory may be discarded but could become records if circulated.
Scott Mahalik (staff/legal counsel) cautioned that case law creates nuance. He cited local authorities and cases (including a Yacobelas v. Bellingham discussion and reference to Nissan v. Pierce County) to explain that notes kept exclusively to refresh an official's memory and not shared are often not considered records, but content on personal devices or personal email can nonetheless be subject to production under PRA depending on circumstances. "Just because it's on a personal email, personal, tablet, computer device... those things are... still considered records," Mahalik told council.
Council members asked specific questions about meeting-invite retention, calendar integration and notification options; staff clarified that transitory scheduling messages are often transitory records but could become records if they contain substantive decision-making or distribution among members. Garcia said the city will provide public-records training and help council members with email access and password resets. No legislative action was taken; the session was informational guidance intended to reduce public-records risk.
