Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Taxes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tax commissioner briefs committee on homestead, disabled‑veteran and primary‑residence tax credits
Summary
Tax Commissioner Brian Krashes told the budget section how Homestead, Disabled Veteran and Primary Residence credits work, described recent statutory expansions, deadlines and outreach results, and warned of tight appropriations for the current biennium.
Tax Commissioner Brian Krashes presented an overview of three major property‑tax relief programs — the Homestead Property Tax Credit, the Disabled Veteran Credit and the Primary Residence Credit (PRC)—and answered committee questions about eligibility, outreach and budgetary risk.
Krashes reminded members that the Homestead Property Tax Credit, enacted in 1969, reduces taxable value for homeowners who are 65 or older or permanently and totally disabled and who meet net household income thresholds (statute shows $70,000 or less, with medical expenses deductible). He said the program’s parameters have been amended over time and that annual fluctuations in income can push applicants in and out of eligibility.
On the Disabled Veteran Credit, Krashes said qualifying veterans (service‑connected disability 50% or greater, honorable discharge) must own and occupy the property; the program has no income thresholds. He said the most recent session increased the taxable‑value reduction from $8,100 to $9,000.
Krashes discussed the Primary Residence Credit changes, noting a statutory April 1 application deadline. The PRC increase to $1,600 and an expanded eligibility (homes in trusts and manufactured‑home special application windows) produced a spike in participation; Krashes reported roughly 10,365 additional applications during the most recent expansion and said the agency handled roughly 11,000 calls during the special period (down from 24,000 previously).
Committee members pressed Krashes on whether the $1,600 credit is sufficient and on uneven market valuation across jurisdictions. Krashes acknowledged residents will disagree on the sufficiency of a flat amount and raised the prospect of stair‑stepping valuation adjustments and county input to address rapid local revaluations.
On budgets, Krashes said the department is "snug" on homestead appropriations—tracking approximately $55 million at current participation rates—and that PRC funding is tied to legacy fund earnings, making the PRC appropriation more sensitive to market projections. He said marketing and outreach funds can now be used to promote homestead and disabled‑veteran programs in addition to PRC.
Krashes recommended monitoring participation and considering a small window for good‑cause late applications in complex special‑application circumstances (for example, manufactured/mobile homes), but he said any change should be carefully designed to avoid confusing the broader eligible population.
The presentation ended with committee discussion of potential stair‑stepping and valuation equity between urban and rural communities and no immediate statutory actions were taken at the meeting.
