Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Comp Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Juan County staff propose policy to ensure minimum densities are buildable in East Sound UGA
Summary
Planning staff introduced draft comp plan policy 17.15 to require site planning where minimum densities are mapped in East Sound’s urban growth area, arguing code updates are needed so maps reflect realistic buildable capacity. An informational meeting is set for the 16th; the planning commission hearing is on the 19th.
Planning staff on the county’s EPRC outlined a proposal to add policy 17.15 to the land use element that would require site planning for designations with minimum densities so those mapped densities are realistically achievable.
“Sofia,” the planning staff member who presented the draft, said the policy would “ensure that development standards promote actualization of the urban densities established by the official maps” and give the county the comp-plan-level authorization to pursue changes to the Uniform Development Code. Staff said the language is meant to be high-level; technical details would be worked out later in code amendments.
Why it matters: several map changes proposed for East Sound would convert parcels from rural to urban designations and, in some places, increase allowable densities (for example from 4 to 8 or 8 to 12 units per acre). Committee members stressed that existing dimensional limits — notably a 30% lot coverage cap, height restrictions and setbacks — can make meeting those minimum densities infeasible unless the code’s dimensional standards are reworked.
Public comment and data: staff said they received at least one public comment suggesting a 50% lot coverage maximum to enable 12 units per acre, a point the presenter identified as coming from Bridal Klein. Committee members cautioned that raising lot coverage risks eroding rural character and recommended further analysis before adopting a numeric coverage figure in the comp plan.
Process and next steps: staff told the committee an informational meeting aimed at educating residents about the UGA proposal is scheduled for the afternoon of the 16th (location pending) and that the planning commission will hold a hearing on the 19th. The staff report for the hearing is substantial, and staff encouraged committee members and residents to review it; technical UDC amendments would follow if the comp plan policy is adopted.
What staff said about tradeoffs: presenters noted the policy’s purpose is to avoid a mismatch between the map and the code — for example, a designation that allows up to 12 units per acre becomes meaningless if lot coverage, height limits or setbacks make it physically impossible. The committee discussed using site plans or other code tools to show that future densities are feasible while retaining protections (for shorelines and other critical areas) through the county’s CAO and variance processes.
Next procedural steps: the draft policy will appear at the planning commission hearing; if the planning commission advances it, the county would follow with edits to the Uniform Development Code to spell out site‑planning requirements. The EPRC indicated it will follow the planning commission hearing and provide comments to staff.
