Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Noise Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Woodstock staff propose noise‑ordinance changes; council favors right‑of‑way measurement and a trial period
Summary
Staff proposed updates to Chapter 30, Article 2 to add a downtown entertainment district with higher noise thresholds and longer hours; council preferred measuring from the right of way, removing the formal complainant requirement, and agreed to a warning/trial period before citations.
Get email alerts on the Noise Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City planning staff presented proposed revisions to Woodstock’s noise ordinance (Chapter 30, Article 2) at the Aug. 18 work session, asking council for direction before returning an ordinance for adoption.
Ms. Menard, a city planner, said the redlined changes address three areas: prohibitions and penalties for loud and unnecessary noises, a measurement method (property line or right of way), and a distinct set of limits for the downtown entertainment district. "What staff has proposed is an additional category pertaining to the already established downtown entertainment district that has slightly higher noise limit and a time range that goes from 7am to midnight instead of 10pm which is what applies to the rest of the city," she said.
Council members raised enforcement and measurement concerns. One council member recommended using the right of way rather than interior measurements, noting property lines can be hard to discern and interior tests require closed windows and raise practical enforcement problems. Several members supported a trial period that would issue warnings (e.g., 30–90 days) and gather measurement data before imposing citations. The council also directed staff to remove the requirement that a resident be the formal complainant, allowing officers to act on observed violations.
Staff also noted options used in other cities, such as buffers keeping nests or staging areas away from residences and screening requirements to reduce visual and acoustic impacts.
What’s next: Staff will finalize the redline, incorporate council feedback (right‑of‑way measurement, removal of complainant requirement, trial/warning period) and bring an ordinance back to council for adoption within the next few weeks.
