Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clarksville council reviews slate of rezoning requests; staff recommends approval on multiple cases
Summary
City staff briefed the Clarksville City Council on a multi-item planning commission report that included a series of rezoning applications affecting several wards.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff briefed the Clarksville City Council on a multi-item planning commission report that included a series of rezoning applications affecting multiple wards.
Planning staff said the package includes requests to extend C5 (Highway and Arterial Commercial) along the 41A corridor (Z312025, applicant Luke Baggett), convert two downtown parcels to Central Business District within the H1 historic overlay to allow multifamily infill (Z322025, Ross and Ashley Morford / Armor Holdings LLC), reclassify a 14.31-acre Trenton Road site to a mix of R4 and C5 for mixed-use development (Z332025, Todd Morris), convert an RM1 mobile-home lot to R2D for duplex housing (Z342025, Ligon Home Builders / Ronnie Gano), and change an 8-acre C4 parcel to C2 for mixed commercial and multifamily use (Z352025, Tiny Town Apartments LLC). Staff also presented a large, ~200-acre regional commercial proposal (E36/20025, Larry Racony Jr. and the Feltner family partnership) that would add C3/C4/C5 zoning near Ted Crozer Boulevard and Dunlop Lane.
Staff repeatedly warned of site-specific constraints that will shape later development: several parcels will require sewer extensions or utility upgrades; at least two sites noted potential sinkholes and the need for hydrology review; one parcel may require water-main upgrades and fire-access improvements; and school-system capacity comments were filed for the residential projects. For one parcel adjacent to neighborhoods, staff said connection rules could require access through an interior subdivision road or an appeal to the access appeals board for direct 41A access.
"Staff does recommend approval," planning staff said for the several applications the commission reviewed, and the planning commission likewise recorded recommendations of approval for most cases. Council members asked technical questions about driveway and street-connection options, traffic-assessment requirements, and whether historic-overlay protections would remain in effect (for the CBD request staff confirmed the H1 overlay would be maintained).
Next steps: most items were presented for council consideration and will either return for first reading or be scheduled for future public hearings and site-plan review. The large regional proposal was described as likely to be developed in phases and will require multiple site-plan approvals and infrastructure work before construction can proceed.

